Influences of Dixon anus preserving surgery on curative effect, anorectal function and stress response in patients with low rectal cancer / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective:To investigate the influences of Dixon anus preserving surgery on the curative effect, anorectal function and stress response of patients with low rectal cancer.Methods:A total of 150 patients with low rectal cancer admitted to Zhangjiakou Fifth Hospital from May 2016 to March 2019 were retrospective analysis as the study subjects. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into the study group (75 cases) and the control group (75 cases). The patients in the study group received Dixon operation, and the patients in the control group received Miles operation. The general condition of operation, postoperative urination function, stress response [C reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), cortisol (Cor) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)], anorectal function [anal resting pressure (ARP), maximal squeeze pressure (MSP), anal longest contraction time (ALCT)], quality of life (PAC-QOL score), postoperative complications, local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, 3-year tumor free survival rate and 3-year overall survival rate were compared between the two groups.Results:The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume in the study group were lower than those in the control group: (172.28 ± 23.45) min vs. (189.57 ± 23.68) min, (177.39 ± 21.23) ml vs. (191.35 ± 22.67) ml, (342.36 ± 52.89) ml vs. (489.42 ± 63.33) ml, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). The levels of CRP, IL-6, Cor and ACTH in the study group were lower than those in the control group: (22.35 ± 4.75) mg/L vs. (35.65 ± 5.28) mg/L, (58.74 ± 15.11) μg/L vs. (79.63 ± 20.23) μg/L, (145.36 ± 27.48) ng/L vs. (156.48 ± 32.55) ng/L, (44.58 ± 5.27) ng/L vs. (49.62 ± 5.68) ng/L, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). The urination function and anorectal function of the patients in the study group were obviously better than those in the control group 6 months after operation, and the PAC-QOL score was obviously lower than that in the control group: (22.53 ± 2.86) scores vs. (27.54 ± 3.21) scores ( P<0.05); there was no obvious difference between the study group and the control group in the incidence of postoperative complications, local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, 3-year tumor free survival rate and 3-year total survival rate ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Dixon operation is effective in the treatment of low rectal cancer. It can preserve the anorectal function of patients to the greatest extent, protect urination function, reduce stress reaction of patients, and it is more conducive to rapid rehabilitation of patients.

Chronic Functional Constipation / 대한소화기학회지

Constipation is a common functional problem of the digestive system and may occur secondary to diet, drugs, endocrine diseases, metabolic diseases, neurological diseases, psychiatric disorders, or gastrointestinal obstruction. When there is no secondary cause, constipation is diagnosed as functional constipation. The first steps that should be taken to relieve symptoms are diet and lifestyle modifications, and if unsuccessful, laxative therapy should be initiated. If a patient does not respond to laxative therapy, diagnostic anorectal physiological tests are performed, though they are not routinely recommended. However, these tests may be considered earlier in patients strongly suspected to have a defecatory disorder. The revised guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation will undoubtedly aid the individualized management of chronic constipation in clinical practice.

Emphasize on the postoperative anal function of middle and low rectal cancer patients / 中国实用外科杂志

Organ function preservation emphasizes the application of various therapeutic techniques to avoid or reduce the influence of tumor treatment process on the normal function of cancer organs and adjacent organs under thepremise of ensuring the best prognosis of oncology. Modern surgical treatment of middle and low rectal cancer does requireanal organ function preservation, but the current rectal cancer guidelines lack guidance on how to protect organ function. Inthe author's opinion,modern colorectal surgeons should recognize that anal function is an important factor affecting the quality of life after rectal cancer surgery. Functional considerations should be raised to the same level as techniqueas to whether the patient should preserve the anus. Correct evaluation of postoperative defecation function of patients isthe basis of selecting anal preservation indications.Preoperative evaluation of risk factors for anal dysfunction are helpful to predict postoperative functional status. The rational use of multidisciplinary strategies is recommended to reduce surgical trauma and improve anastomosis techniques to achieve functional preservation in middle and low rectal cancer.

The gender differences and psychological factors for the anal rectal pressure of senile patients with functional constipation / 重庆医学

Objective To investigate the gender differences and psychological influencing factors for anal rectal function in senile patients with functional constipation (FC) .Methods The gender differences and correlation of anal rectal function and psychological factors were compared in elderly patients and control group by anorectal manometry and psychological testing methods .Results The anal pressure drops of analog defecation of elderly female and male patients were attenuated and the rectal sensation thresholds increased compared with that of control group ,and the maximal squeezing pressure ,the rectal defecation pressure and anorectal pressure difference of elderly female patients were attenuated compared with that of elderly male patients .The SAS and SDS stand‐ard score of elderly female and male patients were significantly higher than that of control group .The SAS standard score of elderly female patients were higher than elderly male patients .SAS and SDS were negatively correlated with anorectal pressure difference and positively correlated with rectal first sensation volume (FSV) .Conclusion Anorectal dysfunction and psychological factors were involved in the elderly FC pathogenesy ,and they were related .Elderly female patients suffered more severe anxiety and anorectal motility disorders than male patients .

The gender differences of anal rectal function and depression and / or anxiety in elderly patients with constipation / 中国医师进修杂志

Objective To investigate the gender differences of anal rectal function and depression and/or anxiety in elderly patients with functional constipation (FC).Methods Twenty-seven elder female FC patients (elder female patients group),20 elder male FC patients (elder male FC patients group),28 elder healthy female (elder healthy female group) and 24 elder healthy male (elder healthy male group) were selected.The gender differences and correlation of anal rectal function and psychological factors were compared in elderly patients and control group,by using anorectal manometry and psychological testing methods.Results Compared with elder healthy female group,maximum squeeze pressure (MSP),anorectal pressure decreased in elder healthy male group(P ＜ 0.05 or ＜ 0.01),anal canal overpressure,first sensation volume(FSV),defecating sensation volume(DSV),maximum tolerable volume(MTV) increased in elder female patients group (P＜ 0.01).Compared with elder male healthy group,anal canal excess pressure increased,anorectal pressure decreased (P＜ 0.05),and FSV,DSV,MTV increased in elder male patients group (P ＜ 0.01 or ＜ 0.05).MSP,rectum systolic pressure,anorectal pressure in elder female patients group was lower than that in elder male patients group (P ＜ 0.05 or ＜ 0.01),rectal tube excess pressure and rectal sensation threshold was higher than that in elder male patients group,but there was no significant difference (P ＞ 0.05).RRP,rectum systolic pressure,anorectal pressure in elder female healthy group was lower than that in elder male healthy group (P ＜ 0.01).FSV was higher than that in elder male healthy group (P ＜ 0.01).SAS score and SDS score was higher in elder female patients group was higher than that in elder female healthy group (P＜ 0.01),SAS score and SDS score was higher in elder male patients group was higher than that in elder male healthy group(P＜ 0.05 or ＜ 0.01).SAS score was negatively correlated with MSP,rectum systolic pressure,anorectal pressure(P ＜ 0.01),was positively correlated with FSV(P ＜ 0.05).SDS score was negatively correlated with anorectal pressure (P ＜ 0.01),was positively correlated with FSV,DSV,MTV (P ＜0.01).Conclusions Anorectal dys function and psychological factors are involved in the elderly FC pathogenesy,and the two are related.Elderly female patients exist more severe anxiety and anorectal motility disorders than male patients.

Clinical and Physiologic Anorectal Function after Low Anterior Resection in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Straight and Colonic J-Pouch Anastomoses

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to analyze anorectal physiologic and clinical outcomes of the colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis compared with the traditional straight colorectal anastomosis after ultra-low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer, thus to define if this method of modified reconstruction has a functional superiority. METHODS: After total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancers, patients were randomized to either a straight (n=23) or a colonic J-pouch anastomosis (n=24) to the lowermost rectum or anal canal. Functional outcomes were compared between two groups using an anorectal manometry performed before and 1 year after surgery and a bowel function questionnaire administered 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Except the arithmetic level of anastomosis which was significantly higher in straight group than in pouch group (5.1 +/- 1.2 cm vs. 3.8 +/- 0.9 cm; P=0.0001), the two groups were well matched for demographic distribution, pathologic stage, colonic segment used for neorectum and use of adjuvant therapies. Patients with colonic J-pouch anastomosis showed functional superiority in terms of frequency of bowel movements, degree of urgency at 6 months (P<0.0001 and =0.03, respectively) and 1 year postoperatively (P<0.0001 and <0.05, respectively). Functional parameters, including incontinence to liquid stool and impaired discrimination between gas and stool were more pronounced in straight group after 6 months (P=0.04, and <0.05, respectively), but the differences were not statistically significant after 1 year. Sensation of incomplete evacuation was not different statistically between groups at 6 months, but more common in J-pouch group at 1 year (39.1% vs. 8.3%; P=0.04). As well as the length of high pressure zone and presence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex, there was no difference in sphincter pressure parameters between groups either before or 1 year after surgery. Maximal tolerable volume of the neorectum in J-pouch group was 110.2 +/- 16.7 ml, which was significantly larger than that of 74.1 +/- 14.9 ml in straight group (P<0.0001), and the neorectum in J-pouch group was significantly more compliant than that in straight group (6.1 +/- 1.9 vs. 3.3 +/- 2.1; P<0.0001) in 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Construction of a colonic J-pouch as a substitute for the rectum restores neorectal volume and compliance. Clinically it offers patients superior anorectal function compared with straight anastomosis. To minimize evacuation difficulty associated with the pouch, optimal size of the pouch should be defined, thus to achieve an ideal balance between stool frequency/urgency and evacuation problems through larger prospective studies.

Change of Anorectal Function after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE: The anorectal function after a low anterior resection for rectal cancer recovered progressively by 6 12 months after the operation, but the mechanisms and the recovery process are not well understood. The aim of this study was to correlate postoperative anorectal function after low anterior resection with physiologic parameters. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients who underwent a low anterior resection for rectal cancer were studied. The control group was consisted of normal persons. Anorectal physiologic studies were conducted for 6 months postoperatively by using defecographys, anorectal manometry and electomyogram of pudendal nerve. RESULTS: The postoperative anorectal function was gradully improved with time. Defecograms showed that the resting, squeezing, and straining anorectal angles were not significantly increased. Anorectal manometry showed that the threshold volume and the urgency volume were not significantly decreased but the maximal tolerable volume was decreased remarkably. The maximal resting pressure significantly decreased but the maximal squeezing pressure were not. The pudendal nerve electromyograms were not significantly different between the two groups. The patients were divided by based on the anastomosis level. The short anastomosis group showed more impairment in the urgency volume and the maximal resting pressure than that of the long anastomosis group. CONCLUSION: The neorectal volume and the level of anastomosis were important for changes in the anorectal function after a low anterior resecton. Gradual improvement of symptoms resulted from a resected rectal adapted to a neorectal volum.

A Study of Anal Manometric Finding after Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer

PURPOSE: Low anterior resection, irrespective of anastomotic technique, may be associated with frequent bowel movement and other bowel management difficulties. The aim of this study was to access the anorectal function after low anterior resection of the rectal cancer. METHODS: We studied 28 patients who had mid and low rectal cancer (average 8.3 cm above the anal verge) had undergone low anterior resection using stapling suture devices (average level of anastomosis was 3.8 cm above anal verge) and anal manometry was undertaken 95 times preoperatively (N=28) and 3 month (N=26), 6 months (N=22) and 12 months (N=19) postoperatively from 1992 to 1995 in Korea University Guro Hospital. RESULTS: Maximum resting pressure was reduced after resection (from 64.7 mmHg to 42.7 mmHg, change ?22 mmHg) but gradually increased and returned to preoperative level at 12 months postoperatively. Minimum perceived volume was decreased after operation (from 40.3 ml to 25 ml change of ?15.3 ml) and this change persist at 12 months postoperatively. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex was present in all patient before surgery but disappeared in most of the patient after operation. Reflex returned to normal in 4 of 22 patients at 6 months later and in 7 of 19 patients at 12 months after operation. Maximum squeezing pressure and maximum tolerable volume were not decreased after operation. CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal function (maximum resting pressure, minimum perceived volume and rectoanal inhibitory reflex) was reduced immediately after low anterior resection of rectal cancer. But this functional changes returning to normal at 6 months and most of the patients had good function at 12 months after operation.